Michigan Supreme Court Refuses to Reconsider its Decision to Reject Class Action Against Pharmacies for Allegedly Overcharging Medicaid for Generic Prescription Drugs
On August 5, 2014, the Michigan Supreme Court (the "Court") declined to reconsider its decision to reject two class actions and a qui tam action against CVS Caremark Corporation, Rite Aid of Michigan, Inc., and several other pharmacies. The lawsuits were based on allegations that the companies had overcharged Medicaid for generic prescription drugs.
The underlying case was argued before the Court on January 16, 2014, and the Court ruled against the plaintiffs on June 11, 2014. The plaintiffs argued that the pharmacies violated Michigan Public Health Code, MCL 333.17755(2), which requires a pharmacist to “pass on the savings in cost” when dispensing a generic drug instead of a brand name drug.
In the Court's opinion, Chief Justice Robert Young Jr. wrote that the plaintiffs failed to adequately plead their cause of action because they attempted to extrapolate to all of the defendants a single set of data regarding costs - specifically the wholesale costs from one Kroger pharmacy in West Virginia - as the basis for their complaint.
The plaintiffs argued that the Michigan defendants' costs were not materially different from the West Virginia Kroger's data set because their purchasing power was substantially the same. However, Young explained that “The connection drawn between the West Virginia data and pharmaceutical sales in Michigan is simply too tenuous and conclusory to state a claim for relief.”
In this case, the plaintiffs' allegations could not be based on such "tenuous and conclusory" facts because of the heightened pleading standards required for fraud claims. Moreover, the plaintiffs' pleading approach was "overbroad" in that they failed to identify the specific transactions in which generic drugs were dispensed in place of brand-name drugs.
If you have any questions about this case, or healthcare law issues in general, please contact Attorney Jack Siebers.
Jack is most commonly thought of as a business lawyer, although his resume and client list quickly reveal his expertise in the health care, insurance industry services and real estate acquisitions and development.View All Posts by Author ›
- Electronic Health Records
- Accountable Care Organizations
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Department of Labor
- Alerts and Updates
- Health Insurance Exchange
- Workers' Compensation
- Employee Benefits
- Did you Know?
- Fraud & Abuse
- Legislative Updates
- Medicaid Planning
- COVID-19 and Workers' Compensation
- News & Events
- Digital Assets
- Health Care Reform
- Long-Term Care
- Affordable Care Act
- Labor Relations
- HITECH Act
Best Lawyers® 2021
Congratulations to the attorneys of the Health Care practice group at Foster Swift Collins & Smith, PC for their inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America 2021 edition. Firm-wide, 44 lawyers were listed. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation and as lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed; inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. Health Care practice group members listed in Best Lawyers are as follows:
To see the full list of Foster Swift attorneys listed in Best Lawyers 2021, click here.