IRS Questioned by House Committee Following Alleged Seizure of Medical Records
On Tuesday, June 11, members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce sent a letter to acting IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel requesting information regarding how the IRS handles confidential medical information. The letter comes after a recent lawsuit alleging that the IRS illegally seized over 60 million medical records in 2011.
The lawsuit, a class action filed by an unnamed health care provider against 15 unnamed IRS agents, alleges that the agents improperly seized the medical records in violation of the Fourth Amendment during a search executed on March 11, 2011. According to the complaint, the agents seized more than ten million medical records despite knowing that the records were not within the scope of their warrant, (which authorized only the seizure of financial records related to a former employee). The seized records allegedly contained "intimate and private information . . . including psychological counseling, gynecological counseling, [and] sexual or drug treatment." The complaint further alleges that the agents threated to "rip out" the servers containing the medical data if the company's IT personnel did not voluntarily transfer the information to the IRS.
In its letter, the Committee expressed concern for safeguarding the privacy of medical information and asked for written responses to the following requests:
- An outline of the IRS's policies and procedures for requesting and examining protected health information from a HIPAA-covered entity;
- Whether, in the IRS's opinion, the term "return information," as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 6103, includes electronic medical records obtained pursuant to a warrant or those obtained improperly or inadvertently;
- A description of the policies or procedures in place to ensure that any seized medical records remain confidential; and
- Whether the IRS is obligated to maintain the confidentiality of medical records under 26 U.S.C. § 6103 and whether it is required to return such information.
The House noted its particular concern with the IRS's handling of private medical records in light of its role in implementing many provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The letter points out that although HIPAA restricts the ability of covered entities to release protected health information, it contains no restrictions on the IRS's use of such information after it is seized.
While there is no word yet from the IRS, committee leaders asked Werfel to respond by June 21, 2013.
Julie C. LaVille authored this article as a Law Clerk.
Categories: Health Care Reform, HIPAA
Categories
- Licensing
- Criminal
- HITECH Act
- Medicare
- Electronic Health Records
- Employee Benefits
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Physicians
- Regulatory
- Tax
- Did you Know?
- Retirement
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Compliance
- Cybersecurity
- Department of Labor
- Health Insurance Exchange
- Patents
- HIPAA
- Digital Assets
- Alerts and Updates
- Audits
- Medicare/Medicaid
- Technology
- Workers' Compensation
- Fraud & Abuse
- News
- Affordable Care Act
- Lawsuit
- News & Events
- Labor Relations
- Regulations
- Legislative Updates
- Medicaid Planning
- Employment
- COVID-19 and Workers' Compensation
- Hospice
- Providers
- Contracts
- Health Care Reform
- Hospitals
- Pharmacy
- Privacy
- Long-Term Care
- Insurance
- Billing/Payment
Best Lawyers® 2021
Congratulations to the attorneys of the Health Care practice group at Foster Swift Collins & Smith, PC for their inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America 2021 edition. Firm-wide, 44 lawyers were listed. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation and as lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed; inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. Health Care practice group members listed in Best Lawyers are as follows:
- Jennifer B. Van Regenmorter, Holland
To see the full list of Foster Swift attorneys listed in Best Lawyers 2021, click here.