Health Care Law Blog Banner

Health Care Law Blog

4th Circuit Opinions on Health Care Reform Sidestep Issue of Constitutionality
Posted by:

health care reform The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued two opinions related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("PPACA"), also commonly referred to as Health Care Reform.  What is interesting in these two decisions is that the appellate court refrains from ruling on the constitutionality of PPACA.  Instead, it does not even address the issue because it found adequate grounds to dismiss both cases based on lack of jurisdiction.

In Commonwealth of Virginia v Kathleen Sebelius, Virginia had challenged the constitutionality of the "individual mandate" provision of PPACA, which financially penalizes individual taxpayers who fail to maintain health insurance coverage.  The lower court ruled in favor of Virginia by finding the individual mandate provision to be unconstitutional.  The appellate court determined that the constitutional issue should not even have been considered because the sole plaintiff, i.e., Virginia, lacked standing to initiate and pursue the case.  It noted that PPACA, specifically with regard to the individual mandate provision, did not impose an obligation on Virginia.  Accordingly, Virginia did not suffer from an injury that could be remedied through the court system.  In the appellate court's words, "Virginia lack[ed a] personal stake in this case."  The appellate court therefore lacked jurisdiction to address the constitutional question.  As a result, the appellate court vacated the lower court's judgment and instructed that the case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

The other PPACA-related opinion released by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals today was Liberty University et. al  v Timothy Geitner et. al.  In that case, plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of the individual mandate as well as the "employer mandate," which imposes an assessment on a large employer if it has employees that receive a tax credit or government subsidy to offset payments for health-related expenses.  The plaintiffs requested an injunction that would restrain the Secretary of the Treasury (among others) from implementing and enforcing PPACA.  The district court directly addressed the constitutionality of the challenged PPACA provisions and found them to be constitutional.  The appellate court determined the lower court had improperly considered the merits of the case because it lacked jurisdiction to do so.  The appellate court determined that the case constituted a pre-enforcement action that sought to prevent the assessment of a tax before it was imposed.  As such, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case.  Therefore, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case with instructions that it should be dismissed.

Unlike the recent Courts of Appeal decisions that have addressed PPACA (discussed here and here), the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals sidesteps the pivotal issue of the constitutionality of the law.  In both cases discussed above, it summarily dismissed the action on jurisdictional grounds and avoided addressing the "big question" of whether PPACA should be upheld.

If you would like more information on the legal developments related to PPACA, stay tuned to this blog or contact one of the health care law attorneys at Foster Swift.

Authors

Categories

Recent Posts

Jump to Page

Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek