Updates to the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records Regulations
Earlier this year, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), a branch of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), finalized updates to the Confidentiality of Substance Use Disorder Patient Records regulation at 42 CFR Part 2 ("Part 2").
Part 2 protects the confidentiality of patient records relating to substance use disorder education, prevention, training, treatment, rehabilitation or research. Under Part 2, a substance abuse program that receives federal funding may release patient information only with the patient’s written consent, unless an exception applies. Part 2 was originally enacted in 1975 to address the concern that individuals might be deterred from seeking treatment for substance use disorders due to a fear that their identities could be revealed.
According to SAMHSA, the updates to Part 2 reflect an effort to (1) facilitate the exchange of information within new integrated care models; (2) better align Part 2 requirements with those of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); and (3) address privacy concerns of patients who are confronting substance abuse disorders and their families.
Some of the major updates to Part 2 are listed below:
- The final rule permits the disclosure of Part 2 patient information to qualified personnel for purposes of conducting scientific research if the researcher meets certain requirements.
- The final rule provides that a patient may consent to disclosing their information using a general designation in certain circumstances, in order to allow patients to benefit from integrated health systems.
- The final rule permits disclosures of patient identifying information to certain contractors, subcontractors, and legal representatives for payment and health care operations activities without patient consent, if certain requirements are met.
- The final rule will assist users of electronic health records (EHRs) by permitting use of an abbreviated notice of prohibition on re-disclosure that is more easily accommodated in EHR text fields.
If you have any questions regarding these updates to Part 2, please contact a member of our health care practice group.
- Employee Benefits
- 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- HITECH Act
- Digital Assets
- Electronic Health Records
- Affordable Care Act
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Health Insurance Exchange
- Labor Relations
- News & Events
- Department of Labor
- Fraud & Abuse
- Did you Know?
- Health Care Reform
Best Lawyers® 2020
Congratulations to the attorneys of the Health Care practice group at Foster Swift Collins & Smith, PC for their inclusion in the Best Lawyers in America 2020 edition. Firm-wide, 42 lawyers were listed. Best Lawyers lists are compiled based on an exhaustive peer-review evaluation and as lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be listed; inclusion in Best Lawyers is considered a singular honor. Health Care practice group members listed in Best Lawyers are as follows:
- Gilbert M. Frimet, Southfield
- Richard C. Kraus, Lansing
- Gary J. McRay, Lansing
- Jack A. Siebers, Grand Rapids/Holland
- Jennifer B. Van Regenmorter, Holland
To see the full list of Foster Swift attorneys listed in Best Lawyers 2020, click here.