<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
			<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='https://www.healthlawyersblog.com/rss.xsl' ?>
			<rss version='2.0' xmlns:content='http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/'
					xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'
					xmlns:dc='http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/'>
				<channel>
					<title>The New Health Care Law Reform Bill &amp; PPACA | Foster Swift</title>
					<link>https://www.healthlawyersblog.com/author/Michael-Blum-Employment-Law-Attorney</link>
					<atom:link href='https://www.healthlawyersblog.com/author/Michael-Blum-Employment-Law-Attorney?rss' rel='self' type='application/rss+xml' />
					<description><![CDATA[The latest updates to The New Health Care Law Reform Bill &amp; PPACA.]]></description>
					<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 01:11:31 -0400</lastBuildDate>
					
				<item>
				<title>FTC Prohibits Most Noncompete Agreements Between Employers and Workers</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawyersblog.com/ftc-prohibits-most-noncompete-agreements-employers-workers</link>
<dc:creator>Michael R. Blum, Karl W. Butterer, Anthony M. Dalimonte, Clifford L.
Hammond</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>ftc-prohibits-most-noncompete-agreements-employers-workers</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:00:01 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><span>In a 3-2 vote along party lines on April 23, 2024, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) approved and issued a final rule to take effect in 120 days prohibiting most noncompete agreements between employers and workers.&nbsp;The Commission says the new regulations will ensure that American workers have the freedom to pursue a new job, start a new business or introduce a new product or service to the market.</span></p>
<p>See the full, original article here: <a href="https://www.fosterswift.com/communications-FTC-Bans-Most-Noncompete-Agreements-Legal-Challenges.html">FTC Prohibits Most Noncompete Agreements | U.S. Workers | Legal Challenges Expected: Foster Swift</a></p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Avoiding Michigan’s Right to Work Legislation</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawyersblog.com/Avoiding-Michigan-Right-to-Work-Legislation</link>
<dc:creator>Michael R. Blum</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Avoiding-Michigan-Right-to-Work-Legislation</guid>

					<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:00:02 -0500</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p>Michigan’s Right to Work legislation (“Legislation”) was signed into law by Governor Synder on December 12, 2012.&nbsp; The Legislation will become effective on the 91<sup>st</sup> day following the final adjournment of the 2012 regular session of the Michigan legislature (December 27, 2012). Unions are attempting to either renew or extend current collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) prior to the Legislation becoming effective, in an effort to avoid impact that the Legislation would have on union dues and participation.</p>]]></description>
</item>

				<item>
				<title>Health Care Employers Not Required to Post NLRB Notice Until Further
Decision from the Courts</title>
				<link>https://www.healthlawyersblog.com/Health-Care-Employers-Not-Required-Post-NLRB-Notice-Until-Further-Decision</link>
<dc:creator>Michael R. Blum</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink='false'>Health-Care-Employers-Not-Required-Post-NLRB-Notice-Until-Further-Decision</guid>

					<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 09:00:03 -0400</pubDate>
					<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://www.healthlawyersblog.com/assets/htmlimages/Union-post-low-res.jpg" width="200" height="133" title="health care employers" alt="health care employers" border="null" align="left" style="margin-right: 15px; margin-bottom: 15px;" />Previously, the <a target="_blank" title="Read post about notice requirement" rel="noopener" href="http://www.healthlawyersblog.com/Health-Facilities-Post-Notice-Right-to-Organize">Foster Swift Health Care Law Blog</a> notified you of an NLRB requirement for employers to display notices about employees' rights to organize a union.&nbsp; The notice requirement was <a target="_blank" title="Read post about delayed notice requirement" rel="noopener" href="http://www.healthlawyersblog.com/NLRB-Delays-Notice-Requirement-April-30">delayed</a>, and employers were not required to post the notice until April 30, 2012.&nbsp; On April 17, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted an emergency motion for injunction pending appeal and for expedited consideration related to the notice requirement.&nbsp; This was discussed in Foster Swift&rsquo;s recent Employment, Labor &amp; Benefits E-News.&nbsp; In particular, it is important to note that this court's decision means that employers are not required to post the notice until the court rules on the NLRB's authority to promulgate such a requirement.&nbsp; Oral arguments on this issue are expected to occur in September, 2012.&nbsp; Foster Swift's Employment, Labor &amp; Benefits E-News and Health Care Law Blog will keep you posted on this issue.</p>]]></description>
</item>

			</channel></rss>